SisterCasinoRadar exists to answer one question accurately: which casino brands genuinely belong together, and under whom. Every hub and every brand page on this site is the product of the same mapping routine, described below. Nothing here is compiled from other people’s write-ups.
Three claims, three tests
Each page on this site makes up to three kinds of factual claim, and each kind carries its own burden of proof.
Ownership. When we say a brand is operated by a particular entity, that comes from what the brand’s own site discloses pre-login, cross-checked against the relevant licensing register. If the footer entity and the register disagree, we say so rather than picking one.
Siblinghood. Two brands are listed as sisters only when they share an operating entity or licence in a way we can point to. Shared game lobbies, similar templates or affiliate folklore are not enough on their own – plenty of unrelated casinos look alike.
Availability. Statements about which markets a brand serves come from what the public site shows on the day we check it: country selectors, blocked-region notices, currency options and sign-up gating visible without an account. Each of these observations carries its date.
A sweep, step by step
A sweep is what we call one full pass over an operator group. It runs in a fixed order: load each domain fresh and note what resolves; record the operating entity and licence line the site itself displays; check that entity against the licence register it cites; compare those details across every candidate sibling in the group; log the market signals visible from outside; and, for any brand that has shut, follow its old domain to wherever it now lands and date that redirect. The group’s hub and its brand pages are then written from that sweep, not from memory or from a previous version of the page.
Where the lines are drawn
The radar operates outside the casinos it maps, deliberately. We do not open player accounts, deposit funds or claim bonuses. We take no briefings from operators, and no operator sees a page before it is published. We do not reproduce content from review platforms, forums or other sister-sites publications – if a fact only exists second-hand, it either stays out or is clearly marked unconfirmed. Some outbound links on this site may be affiliate links; the disclosure in our terms explains how that works, and no commercial arrangement alters a status, a sibling list or a closure record.
Dates beat opinions
A sister list without a date is folklore. Every page here shows when it was last checked, and material changes – a brand closing, a licence moving, a market being dropped – are recorded against the date we observed them, not the date a press release claimed. When we get something wrong, the fastest route to a fix is the contact page; corrections ship with a note of what changed.
The desk behind the radar
This site is written and maintained by the Radar Desk – a small team that has spent years following offshore operator groups across markets, watching brands launch, migrate and disappear. No individual bylines, one shared standard: if the desk cannot show where a fact came from, the fact does not run.
Questions readers ask
How fresh is the sister list on any given page?
As fresh as its last-verified date, which is printed on the page. Groups in active flux get swept more often than stable ones.
Do operators get any input into their pages?
None. They are not contacted, consulted or offered previews, and there is no mechanism for them to pay for changes.
A brand I play at is missing – why?
Either its group has not been mapped yet, or it belongs to a network this site does not cover. The radar grows group by group, and each brand gets exactly one page once its group is swept.
Can I flag a change you have not caught?
Please do. A URL and a date are the two things that make a reader report actionable – send both via the contact page.